Links |
Who Is Your Creator uses media, including display advertising, to raise awareness of the serious misrepresentations and lack of scientific proof for the theory of Naturalism and Darwinism. |
WHAT WE BELIEVE We believe the Bible is the written word of God, inspired by the Holy Spirit and without error in the original manuscripts. The Bible is the revelation of God’s truth and is infallible and authoritative in all matters of faith and practice. We believe in the Holy Trinity. There is one God, who exists eternally in three persons: the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. We believe that all are sinners and totally unable to save themselves from God’s displeasure, except by His mercy. We believe that salvation is by God alone as He sovereignly chooses those He will save. We believe His choice is based on His grace, not on any human individual merit, or foreseen faith. We believe that Jesus Christ is the eternal Son of God, who through His perfect life and sacrificial death atoned for the sins of all who will trust in Him, alone, for salvation. We believe that God is gracious and faithful to His people not simply as individuals but as families in successive generations according to His Covenant promises. We believe that the Holy Spirit indwells God’s people and gives them the strength and wisdom to trust Christ and follow Him. We believe that Jesus will return, bodily and visibly, to judge all mankind and to receive His people to Himself. We believe that all aspects of our lives are to be lived to the glory of God under the Lordship of Jesus Christ. |
Why did Popular Mechanics look into 9/11?PM first became interested in 9/11 conspiracy theories in the fall of 2004, when a series of advertisements appeared in The New York Times promoting the book Painful Questions, by Eric Hufschmid. The advertisements included a number of claims regarding the physical evidence of the attacks. If true, these claims might have cast doubt on the generally accepted account of 9/11. PM editor-in-chief James B. Meigs asked the magazine's senior staff to begin a preliminary investigation of these and other claims made by 9/11 conspiracy theorists in order to decide whether the topic would be appropriate for an article in Popular Mechanics. Under the supervision of executive editor David Dunbar, the team looked into a wide range of 9/11 theories, and came up with a list of the most widely circulated claims involving tangible evidence. These included claims in the Hufschmid book, as well as assertions regarding the Pentagon and the crash of Flight 93. In a meeting a few days later, we decided that an in-depth investigation of these claims would be both a public service and an interesting story in the Popular Mechanics tradition. The decision was made by the editorial team alone; we received no outside mandate or encouragement to pursue this piece. |
|
Links |